Note: I wrote the following on LH714 to Tokyo but the internet connection all of a sudden failed to function; so I am sending it only now from my hotel in Tokyo...
I am on the way from Germany to Japan, somewhere above Russia, and I have been following today’s games on Lufthansa’s Flynet and Boeing’s Connexion internet services. “What kind of soccer fan are you?” you might ask. I accept that scolding; I should have stayed in Germany. Maybe my Japanese client would have understood. Not watching the games, I am dependent on the soccer linguistics of the bloggers and commentators. And one phrase stands out: “lack of creativity.” Every self-declared soccer expert had the Brazilians, as one expert put it, “at least in the semi-final.” The Economist wrote that Brazil “reigns supreme,” and that German win was “unlikely.” And here are the Brazilians, showing no creativity, and being outclassed by the French. My own take before the start of the worldcup was perhaps too extreme: I had the Brazilian team out before the quarterfinals – a prediction that was, in retrospect, too extreme. (However, who would have thought they’d meet Ghana in the round of 16?)
In times of radical change, and the clearest evidence of this are these quarterfinals, experts are too conservative. Mavericks, like myself, are more likely to get it right. And what is that radical change? First, “soccer as usual” without creativity won’t do anymore. That’s why Brazil is out; that’s why England is out. (One of the commentators described Britain’s act against Portugal as “heroic,” -- a term often used for teams that shined in the past and now fail in their last, desperate effort. Never mind that the Brits rarely shined in the past.) Second, professional and innovative management is required to succeed (see my last blog). Finally, guts, passion and perseverance get you a long way (cf. Zidane) – but most of the young, high paid celebrity players don’t seem to have enough of it.
Recent Comments